City lawyer Peter Wanyama has criticised Speaker Moses Wetang’ula, dismissing the Speaker's allegations of defamation in a demand letter.
In his response, Wanyama denied making any defamatory statements, stating that his comments were fair comment, truthful or an honest opinion - all of which are protected by the Constitution.
He also criticised Wetang’ula’s legal team for failing to specify which words were defamatory, where they were published and how they harmed the Speaker's reputation.
"Without clear particulars, the allegations are baseless," Wanyama stated.
He added that any attempt to intimidate the media or suppress critical commentary would be challenged in court.
Demand Letter
Wetang’ula’s legal team had sent a demand letter on September 3, 2025. The letter accused unnamed publishers of spreading false and harmful claims that were said to destroy the Speaker’s reputation.
The letter demanded that the information be taken down immediately, that a public apology be made, and that compensation be paid. It warned that, if they did not comply, a defamation lawsuit would follow.
In his response, Wanyama emphasised that freedom of expression is protected by Articles 33 and 34 of the Constitution.
These articles protect both press freedom and an individual's right to comment on public matters.
He also argued that public figures, especially those in high political positions, must accept being watched and criticised as part of public life.
Despite his strong position, Wanyama said he was willing to be fair. He offered Wetang’ula a "right of reply" that could be published with the original story, but without admitting he was wrong.
It is still unknown if Wetang’ula’s legal team will go ahead with a defamation suit or accept the offer for dialogue and a right of reply.
