The judiciary has come out to clarify a report regarding a case involving a lady by the name Monica Nyambura Mungai, that was covered by a local television station.
The judiciary through a letter dated October 28, responded to a video by Kameme tv that has been doing rounds on social media, where a man claimed that his wife was given a one-year jail term for dumping trash in an undesignated area.
The man stated that his wife was serving the one-year jail sentence at Thika prisons because they were unable to pay a fine of Ksh250,000 to secure her release.Undated file image of a gavel on the bench in the courtroomKenyans.co.ke
He also noted that he is raising their special needs infant as a single parent while working as a mechanic.
However, the judiciary claims that the woman was presented in court on September 28, and was charged with disposing of waste to the environment contrary to the law.
“When the charges were read out to her, she was asked if she understood and she replied in the affirmative. She further agreed and confirmed she had disposed the solid waste as charged” the judiciary report noted.
“The prosecution asked for one day to get the police file for reading of facts. Ms. Mungai had no objection and on September 29, the facts were read out. She confirmed them as correct and pleaded guilty to the charge,” the report further read.
The court therefore sentenced her to pay a fine of Ksh250,000 or serve one year imprisonment.
The court clarified that she paid the fine on October 25, at 16:45 and was released immediately.
Also, the judiciary requested the public to be aware of certain aspects when appearing before the court.
“While the court room may be intimidating to some, you should never lose sight of the fact that it is meant to administer justice. Never admit to committing an offence if you did not commit it because your admission is what the court goes by. Instead, even where unrepresented by an advocate, raise your hand and when allowed explain to the Judge or Judicial Officer in layman's language exactly what happened,” the judiciary noted.
“The opportunity given to mitigate is your chance to talk about any special circumstances that the court should take into account. In this case while the story in the media says Ms. Mungai was a mother of a young child with special needs, the court was not privy to this information. Ms. Mungai declined to say anything when asked if there were mitigating issues,” the report highlighted.
The judiciary took the chance to remind the media to verify any story touching on courts through the Department of Public Affairs and Communication.
“Getting the facts right, as well as getting both sides of a story are requirements and basic tenets of journalism. Such cross-checking also goes a long way in raising the credibility of news and indeed reinforces the standing and authority of a media house,” the report noted.An undated file image of the Kenya Supreme CourtKenyans.co.keFile
- PLAN IN PLACE24 January 2022 - 8:34 pm
- Recognition24 January 2022 - 6:43 pm
- NEW MEMBER24 January 2022 - 6:02 pm
- Response24 January 2022 - 5:44 pm
- exposed24 January 2022 - 5:57 pm
- new orders24 January 2022 - 4:38 pm
- Uplifting24 January 2022 - 5:07 pm
- revealed24 January 2022 - 3:09 pm
- BEST SUITED24 January 2022 - 2:14 pm
- Defiant24 January 2022 - 1:36 pm
- Revolutionaries24 January 2022 - 2:13 pm
- Remarkable24 January 2022 - 1:03 pm